Serveur d'exploration sur le peuplier

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Relationships between stand composition and ectomycorrhizal community structure in boreal mixed-wood forests.

Identifieur interne : 003D31 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003D30; suivant : 003D32

Relationships between stand composition and ectomycorrhizal community structure in boreal mixed-wood forests.

Auteurs : T. Debellis [Canada] ; G. Kernaghan ; R. Bradley ; P. Widden

Source :

RBID : pubmed:16699911

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

We investigated the community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi under varying overstory tree compositions in the southern mixed-wood boreal forest of Quebec. Sampling took place at two locations of differing postfire ages and nine 100-m2 plots were sampled per location. The dominant overstory tree species in the plots were trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), white birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) or white spruce [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss], and balsam fir [Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.]. Mycorrhizae were analyzed using morphological as well as molecular methods, employing fungal-specific primers to amplify ribosomal DNA for subsequent cloning and sequencing. A total of 1800 mycorrhizal root tips collected from the 18 plots were morphologically classified into 26 morphotypes, with Cenococcum geophilum dominating (36% of root tips). A second set of root tips, selected from the same 18 samples on which the morphological analysis was based, were analyzed using molecular methods. From this analysis, 576 cloned polymerase chain reaction products were screened by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and a total of 207 unique types were found. No one type dominated the system and 159 occurred only once. Sequence analysis of the types that occurred more than once revealed that Piloderma sp., Russula sp., Cortinarius sp., and Lactarius sp. were the most common mycorrhizae. The ectomycorrhizal fungal community structure revealed by the rDNA analysis differed from that observed using morphological methods. Canonical correspondence analyses of the sequenced restriction types and % overstory composition indicate that the distributions of ectomycorrhizal fungi are influenced by the relative proportions of host tree species. The distinct fungal assemblages found in the different plots supported by the different combinations of host tree species provides further support for the need to conserve stand diversity in the southern boreal forest.

DOI: 10.1007/s00248-006-9038-8
PubMed: 16699911


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Relationships between stand composition and ectomycorrhizal community structure in boreal mixed-wood forests.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Debellis, T" sort="Debellis, T" uniqKey="Debellis T" first="T" last="Debellis">T. Debellis</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, Groupe de recherche en écologie forestière interuniversitaire (GREFi), Concordia University, 7100 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8, Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology, Groupe de recherche en écologie forestière interuniversitaire (GREFi), Concordia University, 7100 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>H3G 1M8</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kernaghan, G" sort="Kernaghan, G" uniqKey="Kernaghan G" first="G" last="Kernaghan">G. Kernaghan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bradley, R" sort="Bradley, R" uniqKey="Bradley R" first="R" last="Bradley">R. Bradley</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Widden, P" sort="Widden, P" uniqKey="Widden P" first="P" last="Widden">P. Widden</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:16699911</idno>
<idno type="pmid">16699911</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s00248-006-9038-8</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">003E07</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003E07</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003E07</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">003E07</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">003E07</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Relationships between stand composition and ectomycorrhizal community structure in boreal mixed-wood forests.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Debellis, T" sort="Debellis, T" uniqKey="Debellis T" first="T" last="Debellis">T. Debellis</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, Groupe de recherche en écologie forestière interuniversitaire (GREFi), Concordia University, 7100 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8, Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology, Groupe de recherche en écologie forestière interuniversitaire (GREFi), Concordia University, 7100 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>H3G 1M8</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kernaghan, G" sort="Kernaghan, G" uniqKey="Kernaghan G" first="G" last="Kernaghan">G. Kernaghan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bradley, R" sort="Bradley, R" uniqKey="Bradley R" first="R" last="Bradley">R. Bradley</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Widden, P" sort="Widden, P" uniqKey="Widden P" first="P" last="Widden">P. Widden</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Microbial ecology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0095-3628</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2006" type="published">2006</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>DNA, Fungal (analysis)</term>
<term>DNA, Ribosomal (genetics)</term>
<term>Ecosystem (MeSH)</term>
<term>Molecular Sequence Data (MeSH)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (classification)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (cytology)</term>
<term>Mycorrhizae (genetics)</term>
<term>Phylogeny (MeSH)</term>
<term>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length (MeSH)</term>
<term>Quebec (MeSH)</term>
<term>Trees (microbiology)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>ADN fongique (analyse)</term>
<term>ADN ribosomique (génétique)</term>
<term>Arbres (microbiologie)</term>
<term>Données de séquences moléculaires (MeSH)</term>
<term>Mycorhizes (classification)</term>
<term>Mycorhizes (cytologie)</term>
<term>Mycorhizes (génétique)</term>
<term>Phylogenèse (MeSH)</term>
<term>Polymorphisme de restriction (MeSH)</term>
<term>Québec (MeSH)</term>
<term>Écosystème (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="analysis" xml:lang="en">
<term>DNA, Fungal</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en">
<term>DNA, Ribosomal</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en">
<term>Quebec</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="analyse" xml:lang="fr">
<term>ADN fongique</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en">
<term>Mycorrhizae</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="cytologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Mycorhizes</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="cytology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Mycorrhizae</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en">
<term>Mycorrhizae</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="génétique" xml:lang="fr">
<term>ADN ribosomique</term>
<term>Mycorhizes</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Arbres</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Trees</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Ecosystem</term>
<term>Molecular Sequence Data</term>
<term>Phylogeny</term>
<term>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Données de séquences moléculaires</term>
<term>Phylogenèse</term>
<term>Polymorphisme de restriction</term>
<term>Québec</term>
<term>Écosystème</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We investigated the community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi under varying overstory tree compositions in the southern mixed-wood boreal forest of Quebec. Sampling took place at two locations of differing postfire ages and nine 100-m2 plots were sampled per location. The dominant overstory tree species in the plots were trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), white birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) or white spruce [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss], and balsam fir [Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.]. Mycorrhizae were analyzed using morphological as well as molecular methods, employing fungal-specific primers to amplify ribosomal DNA for subsequent cloning and sequencing. A total of 1800 mycorrhizal root tips collected from the 18 plots were morphologically classified into 26 morphotypes, with Cenococcum geophilum dominating (36% of root tips). A second set of root tips, selected from the same 18 samples on which the morphological analysis was based, were analyzed using molecular methods. From this analysis, 576 cloned polymerase chain reaction products were screened by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and a total of 207 unique types were found. No one type dominated the system and 159 occurred only once. Sequence analysis of the types that occurred more than once revealed that Piloderma sp., Russula sp., Cortinarius sp., and Lactarius sp. were the most common mycorrhizae. The ectomycorrhizal fungal community structure revealed by the rDNA analysis differed from that observed using morphological methods. Canonical correspondence analyses of the sequenced restriction types and % overstory composition indicate that the distributions of ectomycorrhizal fungi are influenced by the relative proportions of host tree species. The distinct fungal assemblages found in the different plots supported by the different combinations of host tree species provides further support for the need to conserve stand diversity in the southern boreal forest.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">16699911</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2006</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">0095-3628</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>52</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2006</Year>
<Month>Jul</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Microbial ecology</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Microb Ecol</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Relationships between stand composition and ectomycorrhizal community structure in boreal mixed-wood forests.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>114-26</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>We investigated the community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi under varying overstory tree compositions in the southern mixed-wood boreal forest of Quebec. Sampling took place at two locations of differing postfire ages and nine 100-m2 plots were sampled per location. The dominant overstory tree species in the plots were trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), white birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) or white spruce [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss], and balsam fir [Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.]. Mycorrhizae were analyzed using morphological as well as molecular methods, employing fungal-specific primers to amplify ribosomal DNA for subsequent cloning and sequencing. A total of 1800 mycorrhizal root tips collected from the 18 plots were morphologically classified into 26 morphotypes, with Cenococcum geophilum dominating (36% of root tips). A second set of root tips, selected from the same 18 samples on which the morphological analysis was based, were analyzed using molecular methods. From this analysis, 576 cloned polymerase chain reaction products were screened by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and a total of 207 unique types were found. No one type dominated the system and 159 occurred only once. Sequence analysis of the types that occurred more than once revealed that Piloderma sp., Russula sp., Cortinarius sp., and Lactarius sp. were the most common mycorrhizae. The ectomycorrhizal fungal community structure revealed by the rDNA analysis differed from that observed using morphological methods. Canonical correspondence analyses of the sequenced restriction types and % overstory composition indicate that the distributions of ectomycorrhizal fungi are influenced by the relative proportions of host tree species. The distinct fungal assemblages found in the different plots supported by the different combinations of host tree species provides further support for the need to conserve stand diversity in the southern boreal forest.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>DeBellis</LastName>
<ForeName>T</ForeName>
<Initials>T</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Biology, Groupe de recherche en écologie forestière interuniversitaire (GREFi), Concordia University, 7100 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8, Canada.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Kernaghan</LastName>
<ForeName>G</ForeName>
<Initials>G</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Bradley</LastName>
<ForeName>R</ForeName>
<Initials>R</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Widden</LastName>
<ForeName>P</ForeName>
<Initials>P</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<DataBankList CompleteYN="Y">
<DataBank>
<DataBankName>GENBANK</DataBankName>
<AccessionNumberList>
<AccessionNumber>AY236334</AccessionNumber>
</AccessionNumberList>
</DataBank>
</DataBankList>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2006</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Microb Ecol</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>7500663</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0095-3628</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D004271">DNA, Fungal</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D004275">DNA, Ribosomal</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D004271" MajorTopicYN="N">DNA, Fungal</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="N">analysis</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D004275" MajorTopicYN="N">DNA, Ribosomal</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D017753" MajorTopicYN="Y">Ecosystem</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008969" MajorTopicYN="N">Molecular Sequence Data</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D038821" MajorTopicYN="N">Mycorrhizae</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="Y">classification</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000166" MajorTopicYN="N">cytology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D010802" MajorTopicYN="N">Phylogeny</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D012150" MajorTopicYN="N">Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D011792" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Quebec</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D014197" MajorTopicYN="N">Trees</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2005</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2005</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2006</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2006</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2006</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16699911</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00248-006-9038-8</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList>
<Reference>
<Citation>Mol Ecol. 2001 Aug;10(8):1855-71</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11555231</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Microb Ecol. 2003 Feb;45(2):128-36</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12545311</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Mol Ecol. 2000 Dec;9(12):1985-96</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11123611</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9396791</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2003 Jun;13(3):171-2</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12836086</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1999 Oct 1;30(2):187-199</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10508943</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Mol Ecol. 1993 Apr;2(2):113-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8180733</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Canada</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Bradley, R" sort="Bradley, R" uniqKey="Bradley R" first="R" last="Bradley">R. Bradley</name>
<name sortKey="Kernaghan, G" sort="Kernaghan, G" uniqKey="Kernaghan G" first="G" last="Kernaghan">G. Kernaghan</name>
<name sortKey="Widden, P" sort="Widden, P" uniqKey="Widden P" first="P" last="Widden">P. Widden</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="Canada">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Debellis, T" sort="Debellis, T" uniqKey="Debellis T" first="T" last="Debellis">T. Debellis</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003D31 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003D31 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    PoplarV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:16699911
   |texte=   Relationships between stand composition and ectomycorrhizal community structure in boreal mixed-wood forests.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:16699911" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 12:07:19 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 12:16:31 2020